Teams that turn over fast, spread across several sites, and safety procedures that leave no room for approximation. Retraining with every arrival costs more than filming once.

A warehouse trains continuously: seasonal staff, temps, new forklift drivers. Induction is spoken, delivered by whoever is free that day, and it changes with the person giving it. Six weeks later the trainee has gone, and the whole thing starts again with the next one.
A shift-start path every new arrival follows on their first morning, identical across sites, replayed with every hiring wave.
The lashing or vehicle-check procedure, readable on the loading dock from a phone, at the exact step causing trouble.
One operation explained three different ways depending on the team doing the induction
Safety instructions signed but never reviewed, with no record of what was actually demonstrated
A seasonal peak where team leaders spend their time shadowing rather than running the operation
The new starter watches the task before doing it, as many times as they need, without tying up an expert for three weeks.
When the assignment lasts a few weeks, upskilling has to fit into a few hours and be replayable with every new intake.
A rule that changes has to reach everyone at once, with a record of who saw it and when.
By recording once what you re-explain at every arrival. The module runs in order, with its assessments, and the completion record stays even when the person leaves. The recording itself never starts over.
Yes. The module issues completion certificates, and the audit log keeps who published what and when. That is the difference between an instruction posted on a wall and one you can rely on.
No. Each site records what is its own, and what is shared gets shared. Nothing enters the knowledge base without approval, so no site inherits another site's procedures.