A tool changes, a process moves on, and the documentation is already two versions behind. Recording your screen takes less time than rewriting all of it.

In a product or support team, the knowledge lives in tools that change every quarter. Documentation rarely keeps up: it is written after release, by someone who did not perform the steps, and it is already wrong at the first interface change.
A path per tool, redone in minutes with each release rather than rewritten from scratch.
The process method statement, kept current, illustrated with the screens lifted from the recording itself.
The same walkthrough re-explained over a call at every new arrival, for want of a reusable record
A knowledge base where nobody knows any more which pages are still correct
In-house experts interrupted several times a day by questions that have already been asked
A new ERP, a new CRM, or in-house software built for a specific need? Without proper training, a digitalisation project fails before it has even started.
Your teams already use AI, and some have probably already become more productive with it. Spread those good practices and bring your whole organisation into the AI era.
Because a wiki says what to do, not what you see on screen while doing it. A three-minute recording replaces a page nobody rereads, and the procedure it produces links to the exact second where the action is visible.
It does, just as documentation does. But re-recording takes a few minutes where rewriting takes half a day: that ratio is what changes, not the shelf life.
You do. Nothing enters the knowledge base without approval: yours, a manager's, or that of the people you appoint.